Proving That There Is No God
Since Atheism relies* on empirical knowledge for what can be known, its adherents* will have to search the whole universe exhaustively in order to conclude that there is no God. That is, they would have to claim omniscience* to include all the facts for their claim to be valid.
The fact is: Atheism relies* on suppression of evidence to support its assertion that there is no God.
The Atheist, because of something called human limitation, cannot go to the far reaches of the universe, nor travel to the past to say for sure that there is no God. It is merely by faith that he holds that there is no God, a faith that the U.S. Supreme Court has established as a secular religion.*
*edited 7-14-05
The fact is: Atheism relies* on suppression of evidence to support its assertion that there is no God.
The Atheist, because of something called human limitation, cannot go to the far reaches of the universe, nor travel to the past to say for sure that there is no God. It is merely by faith that he holds that there is no God, a faith that the U.S. Supreme Court has established as a secular religion.*
*edited 7-14-05
posted at 7:53 PM PermaLink
2 Comments:
You mean omniscience, not omnipotence. Even with omniscience, it doesn't logically follow that atheism relies (not relys) on suppression of evidence.
You're mistaken anyway, atheism doesn't require omniscience - or denial.
http://atheism.about.com/od/aboutatheism/p/atheism101.htm
Yes, I mean omniscience, and I apologize for the misspelling. Thank you for your correction.
Atheism does suppress evidence.
The burden of proof lies on Atheism to prove that there is no God, and it will require omniscience for an Atheist to prove that God doesn't exist.
Post a Comment
<< Home